Seattle Clubs Info

Overview
ABA
Belletini Results
Des Moines Results
Emerald Results
Alki Results
Eastside Results
Mercer Results
Newcastle Results
Pacific Results
Rainbow Results
Seattle Results
UW Results

Local Competitions

Unit 446 Info

Other

Find SeattleBridge on Facebook!

Round Robin IMP League 2011

2011 Round Robin

Final: Yarington wins the 2011 round robin with a final score over Eng of 56-31.

Update: In the second semifinal Eng has defeated Rao 86-37.

Update: In the first semifinal Yarington has defeated Castoriano 92-18.

Update: Rao, Yarington, Eng, and Castoriano have qualified for the playoffs. Rao selected Eng, so Castoriano will play Yarington.

The Round Robin is a way to meet players in a more social setting. The team matches are arranged between captains and are usually hosted by one of the team’s players in their home. The play is competitive but the setting is more relaxed. You have about 6 months to play 5-6 matches; the top 4 teams advance to compete for the title.

The conditions of contest are mostly the same as 2010, but this year groupings are by random draw and the top four teams advance regardless of grouping.

Nine teams entered this year's event:
1. Richard Yarington: Ken Scholes, Leo Svarcs, John Schermer, Kevin Bolan, Bill O’Brien
2. Jeff Ford: Cristal Nell, Patt Dunn, Polly Dunn
3. Rao: Jim Aitken, Greg Ho, John Maki
4. Ray Miller: Sandi Hart, Stan Christie, Rod Caldwell, Ken Christiansen, Dave Setterholm
5. Dave Grubbs: Barbara Nist, Jude Ballard, Cindy Glad, Steve Handley, Howard Epley
6. Joel Castoriano: Ron Tracy, Dave Hildebrand, Eric Bue, Robert Richardson
7. Kim Eng: David Taylor, John Aslin, Paul Schwaighart
8. Nick Tipton: Aaron Mohrman, Jennifer Ballantyne, Joel Fuhrman, Galen Hessen, Scott Martin
9. Chris Moore: Jen Chalfan, Brian Zaugg, Lilianna Dionescu, Adam Ruprecht

Here is the schedule for each team:
1. Yarington will play Tipton, Ford, Miller, Moore, Grubbs, Rao
2. Ford will play Castoriano, Eng Yarington, Moore, Grubbs, Rao
3. Rao will play Castoriano, Eng, Yarington, Tipton, Ford, Miller
4. Miller will play Castoriano, Eng, Yarington, Moore, Grubbs, Rao
5. Grubbs will play Castoriano, Eng, Yarington, Tipton, Ford, Miller
6. Castoriano will play Tipton, Ford, Miller, Moore, Grubbs, Rao
7. Eng will play Tipton, Ford, Miller, Moore, Grubbs, Rao
8. Tipton will play Castoriano, Eng, Yarington, Moore, Grubbs, Rao
9. Moore will play Castoriano, Eng, Yarington, Tipton, Ford, Miller

Results

CaptainRecordVP TotalAverageMax PossibleVs. YaringtonVs. FordVs. RaoVs. MillerVs. GrubbsVs. CastorianoVs. EngVs. TiptonVs. Moore
Yarington4-210818108N/AW 55-49
18 VP
L 46-54
11 VP
W 86-49
24 VP
L 28-38
11 VP
N/AN/AW 72-47
22 VP
W 67-46
22 VP
Ford2-48514.285L 49-55
12 VP
N/AL 42-46
12 VP
N/AW 39-32
19 VP
L 28-72
5 VP
L 53-65
10 VP
N/AW 83-17
27 VP
Rao6-013522.5135W 54-46
19 VP
W 46-42
18 VP
N/AW 76-45
23 VP
N/AW 68-37
23 VP
W 88-60
23 VP
W 105-17
29 VP
N/A
Miller2-46510.8365L 49-86
6 VP
N/AL 45-76
7 VP
N/AW 47-44
18 VP
W 61-39
22 VP
L 50-84
6 VP
N/AL 43-84
6 VP
Grubbs3-39916.599W 38-28
19 VP
L 32-39
11 VP
N/AL 44-47
12 VP
N/AL 49-94
5 VP
W 94-52
25 VP
W 88-22
27 VP
N/A
Castoriano4-211419114N/AW 72-28
25 VP
L 37-68
7 VP
L 39-61
8 VP
W 94-49
25 VP
N/AN/AW 82-29
26 VP
W 84-54
23 VP
Eng4-210317.2103N/AW 65-53
20 VP
L 60-88
7 VP
W 84-50
23 VP
L 52-94
5 VP
N/AN/AW 101-29
28 VP
W 14-0
20 VP
Tipton0-6284.6728L 47-72
8 VP
N/AL 17-105
1 VP
N/AL 22-88
3 VP
L 29-82
4 VP
L 29-101
2 VP
N/AL 56-68
10 VP
Moore3-3721272L 46-67
8 VP
L 17-83
3 VP
N/A W 84-43
24 VP
N/AL 54-84
7 VP
L 0-14
10 VP
W 68-56
20 VP
N/A

Conditions of Contest

All matches are 28 boards long, scored in imps and converted to victory points according to a slightly modified ACBL 30-VP scale:
VPs : IMPs
15-15 : 0
16-14 : 1
17-13 : 2
18-12 : 3-6
19-11 : 7-10
20-10 : 11-15
21-9 : 16-20
22-8 : 21-26
23-7 : 27-33
24-6 : 34-41
25-5 : 42-50
26-4 : 51-60
27-3 : 61-71
28-2 : 72-83
29-1 : 84-95
30-0 : 96+

All matches must be complete by October 31.

The top four teams reach the KO finals. The team with the highest victory point total selects its opponent from the third and fourth place teams. The winners of those matches play for the championship. There is a carryover in knockout matches of 1/3 of the imps from the round robin match if the team that won the round robin match finished with more VPs, and a carryover of 1/5 of the imps from the round robin match if the team that won the round robin finished with equal or fewer VPs. If the teams did not play in the round robin, then there is no carryover.

If there is a tie for victory points, the following shall be used to break the tie. In the event that multiple teams are tied, the steps are followed until a tied team is eliminated, then restarted from the top with the remaining teams. For example, in a three way tie where all three teams had 1 win and 1 loss against each other, then the team lowest ranked in victory points against opponents in common would be eliminated, and the tie between the other two would revert to head-to-head result.

1. Head-to-head result (only if all involved teams played each other)
2. Victory points against opponents in common
3. Victory points against the highest ranking opponent in common
4. Victory points against the next highest ranking opponent in common, and so on until all opponents in common are compared
5. Imps against opponents in common
6. Imps against the highest ranking opponent in common
7. Imps against the highest ranking opponent in common, and so on until all opponents in common are compared
8. Total imps
9. Coin flip

If there is a tie during the knockout phase there will be a 6 board playoff.

In the event of any bridge irregularity, if it is possible the team captains should agree on a ruling. If the captains cannot agree on a ruling, then both should submit written statements of the event to the league commissioner who will make a ruling in consultation with a director.

This is a mid-chart event. However to use a mid-chart convention, all of the ACBL rules must be followed, in particular pre-alerting the conventions and providing a copy of an authorized defense for those methods requiring one.

If the captains do not consult before the match the trailing team has seating rights for the second half. If the score is tied, seating rights are decided randomly. Seating rights do not include the right to choose your team's four players only after it is known which four from the opposing team is playing. If more than four players from either team are available and a dispute results, captains will list their four players for the half simultaneously, reveal the lists, and then seat players.

Teams are expected to play all of their matches, even if they are out of contention. That said, a forfeited match is scored as follows: The offending team receives 0 VPs and is removed from playoff eligibility. The non-offending team gets the maximum of (a) their average Victory Point total in all of their non-forfeited matches, (b) the average Victory Point total of the opponents of the offending side in all of the offending side's non-forfeited matches, or (c) 18 Victory Points.

Any matter not listed in the conditions of contest will be resolved by the league commissioner. The decisions of the commissioner are final.


Previous Years Results